Tuesday, June 28, 2011


Should Ratan Tata advise Mukesh Ambani about how to use his wealth?

A couple of days ago famous industrialist Ratan Tata commented about the lavish life style of another billionaire business tycoon Mukesh Ambani quoting his 27 storied Mumbai house viz., Antilla. Tata said that Mukesh Ambani's house Antilla represents the rich Indian's lack of empathy for the poor. His remarks: "The person who lives in there should be concerned about what he sees around him and [asking] can he make a difference. If he is not, then it's sad because this country needs people to allocate some of their enormous wealth to finding ways of mitigating the hardship that people have." 

Is Ratan Tata right in his remarks or is he misguided in his judgements? Is he aware about the role of an entrepreneur in an economy or is he ignorant of this basic economic fact? Or is his remarks has some underlying assumptions which make those remarks perfectly apt for Mukesh's lifestyle? Let me deal with these questions one by one. I take two scenarios to carry out my analysis. In first scenario we assume that Mukesh Ambani is an honest entrepreneur and his profit comes from the market competition. In second scenario we assume that, Mukesh is not an honest entrepreneur and his profit comes from his business ties with government officials and his manipulation of the system of State. We see the implications of Ratan Tata's remarks under both these scenarios.

Scene 1: Mukesh is an honest entrepreneur
I first make an assertion and then go onto prove it. If Mukesh is an honest entrepreneur then his profit - which he earned in the market competition - is absolutely legitimate, and if he don't desire to do a philanthropist work then that is his voluntary choice. Ratan Tata has no right whatsoever to advise Mukesh about allocating his honestly hard earned wealth amongst the poor people or to comment on his lavish lifestyle.

As Ludwig von Mises explained, the only way in which an entrepreneur can make profit in the market competition is by serving and fulfilling the most urgent wants of his customers in the best possible way, and that best possible way is of providing top quality goods at the lowest possible price. Only those entrepreneurs succeed and make profit in the market process who can ascertain and fulfill the subjective wants of customers in the best way compared to his counterparts. 

By producing and selling top quality goods at a lowest possible price successful entrepreneurs allow even the very poor people to buy his products. By allowing them to buy his products he lifts their standard of living; he lifts them out of their poverty even without raising their nominal meager income. That happens because with the falling prices in the market with the same amount of nominal income people can now buy more goods and services i.e., their real income rises. And no sane person will deny that this is the real way of increasing prosperity in the society; this is the true way of eliminating poverty and lifting the standard of living of millions of poor people. 

Philanthropy, about which Ratan Tata is advising Mukesh, will only help poor people in a very short run i.e., for the urgent immediate consumption purposes. Such help to poor people will actually harm them in the long run by making them dependent on such easy free money. It will not cultivate any habit of hard work and independent living in those people. Redistributing the income will only exacerbate the problem of poverty because human nature is such that most people will always prefer the free goods. Such allocation of rich peoples' income will make everyone of us poor too because rich people play an important role of providing essential savings for the economy. And without savings it is impossible to sustain a labor population in present time which is involved in production of intermediate capital goods. And without capital goods it is impossible to increase the future production of final consumption goods, and without that progress (so-called growth) is not possible. Capitalist class - which includes people coming from all strata of society, and not just rich - plays a pivotal role of supplying this saving. If they are forced to allocate their saving to poor people, who will mostly use it for immediate consumption, then society and economy cannot progress and without progress everyone of us will be poor one day for sure.

And people should not forget another vital economic truth that, honest entrepreneur do not become rich by exploiting the public, but they are made rich by their consumers i.e., the same public. Consumers voluntarily buy the products sold by such sellers because they prefer their products over other sellers. And in this process they give their portion of income to these entrepreneurs making them rich in turn. Profit is a signal that the businessman is fulfilling the most urgent wants of his consumers in a best possible way, and that's why he is rich. On the other hand those entrepreneurs who make losses are not fulfilling consumers' wants properly and so they remain poor in turn by going broke! (to deeply understand the beautiful system of profit & loss I will advise my readers to read Mises' wonderful book, Profit and Loss).     
 
So, if Mukesh is an honest entrepreneur then he has all the rights to keep and use his profit in whatever way he wants to. 

Scene 2: Mukesh is a dishonest entrepreneur
But, if Mukesh Ambani is a dishonest entrepreneur and his profit comes solely from his friendships with the government bureaucrats and politicians then he has no right whatsoever on his wealth. Profit generated by such dishonest political maneuvering is immoral. In a system of government such businessmen are working not to serve their consumers but only to serve the politicians and bureaucrats who help them in restricting the market competition. They actively lobby government so to establish their monopolies in the market. Through these monopolies then they fleece the consumers. And because their profit depends on exploiting the political system they don't care about their consumers. In fact they go to any length to harm their consumers for making such illegitimate and immoral profits. 

This type of system is historically known as 'fascism' and sadly in today's world most of the businessmen, especially the big business houses are making their fat profits by this way only.

If Mukesh Ambani (also Ratan Tata and all others) is doing his business in cahoot with the government officials then his profit is illegitimate. If one day India becomes truly a free country then he should be stripped of his illegal profits (property) and should be convicted and punished for his crimes against the people. He and all such dishonest business tycoons should be incarcerated, may be hanged.       

Conclusion
Looking at these economic facts, if Tata and Mukesh both are honest businessmen and they really want to help people of this country then instead of  allocating their profit to the poor people they should use that capital in producing top quality goods at the lowest possible price. They should try to provide as many economic goods as possible to people of India through market competition. Tata and Mukesh both can profit by serving the needs of poor people. There exists a thriving market even in remotest rural poor areas of the world as C. K. Prahalad has shown. All capable entrepreneurs (existing and new ones) should provide top quality private schools, hospitals, private roads, electricity, water works, sanitation, home etc. goods in these areas at the lowest possible price. That will be the best possible moral way of making a difference in poor peoples' lives; that is the only way in which these entrepreneurs can help the poor in mitigating their hardships. Allocation/redistribution of wealth will only result in misery for all of us.   

1 comments:

kapil69 said...
it's not about being honest/dishonest? it's about show-off lavish life style in a locality which is deprived & it doesn't make sense at all. Every entrepreneur can't be like Bill Gates, i agree & there is no need to be. Ambani can purchase Al Burj or anything like that, nobody will ever comment on that.

Post a Comment

Please leave a civilized comment. Use of bad language is strictly prohibited. I always welcome a healthy discussion.

If you want to carry on the discussion further with me (or want me to reply to your comment) then please email me at: adammalthus-blog@yahoo.com. Privately we can continue the discussion.

Sunday, July 12, 2009

Minitab VALIDATION

Software Validation

At Minitab, we recognize that the software products we create must meet the needs and expectations of our customers within the constraints of feasibility, product integrity, and company viability. They must be the right products and they must operate in the right way.

We also recognize that the quality of software is multidimensional. Quality is not limited by one definition. In creating software, we will seek to balance all aspects of high quality. We will create software products that:

  • Are available to customers in a timely fashion
  • Are reliable and accurate in their operation
  • Present an intuitive interface for both input and output
  • Contain features that help customers do their work better

Finally, we recognize that the pursuit for quality is a journey with no end. We will continuously improve both the processes used to create our software products, and the software products created for our customers.

All statistical and graphical output is validated for market readiness using one or more of the following methods:

  1. Validated by hand or computed calculation. This may involve visual verification of a graph or comparison of a statistical result with an independent calculation using a calculator or computer.
  2. Validated by comparison to other software. One or more existing statistical software products may be used for comparison. Occasionally, specialized software products are used, such as software for analyzing time series data. This form of validation is performed when the answers cannot be easily calculated by hand or engineered code.
  3. Validated by comparison to textbook examples. Data and output from respected textbooks may be used for comparison. Recognizing the inherent risk in published data, this form of validation is performed in combination with one or both of the two previous methods.

There are also a number of controls built into the software development process that contribute to ongoing validation. These are:

  1. Technical support is provided for all of our software products. When customers report problems, our technical staff verifies the nature of the problem, records the details, and determines an appropriate method for addressing the problem.
  2. Minitab has developed extensive automated test suites to verify the accuracy of product functionality. These suites are systematically run to regression test all new versions and conversions of the software. They are also run to validate behavior of the Minitab software in new operating systems as they become available.
  3. The software is submitted to a beta test period prior to release. This test helps to assure consistent results across a variety of hardware and software configurations.

Software Validation Kits

Minitab Statistical Software Validation Kits are downloadable ZIP files which contain details about our validation process, software development life cycle, and other relevant information.

Download the Minitab 15 Software Validation Kit (ZIP file)

If you have any questions about our software validation process, please Contact Us.




SOURCE

software validation RESOURCES

  1. [PDF]

    Software Validation Plan

    File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
    The Software Validation Plan (SVP) must ensure that the following aspects ... validation of the software development in the context of the IMAGE project: ...
    www.aero-scratch.net/Dissemination/Image/DS5_1.pdf - Similar -
  2. [PDF]

    Software Validation in Accredited Laboratories A Practical Guide

    File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View
    Software Validation in Accredited Laboratories. A Practical Guide. Gregory D. Gogates. Fasor Inc. 2042 Hollis Road, Lansdale, Pennsylvania 19446-5721 USA ...
    www.a2la.org/guidance/adequate_for_use.pdf - Similar -
    by GD Gogates - Cited by 2 - Related articles - All 5 versions
  3. (Product Development Insight) Software Validation: Turning ...

    By answering some basic questions about software validation, this article examines the critical concepts for successful validation. ...
    www.devicelink.com/mddi/archive/08/03/009.html - Cached - Similar -
  4. Software Validation Tools Option - Products and Services ...

    Add the Software Validation Tools Option to the NI Developer Suite Core Package and automate your software engineering and validation processes when ...
    sine.ni.com/nips/cds/view/p/lang/en/nid/206887 - Cached - Similar -
  5. Software Validation

    19 Dec 1994 ... In the process of software validation, it is likely that some form of computer output, either graphic or tabular, should accompany the ...
    www.scintco.com/validate.htm - Cached - Similar -
  6. AAMI: Quality System Training: Software Validation

    This 3 day course supplies attendees with information and tools needed to comply with thesoftware validation requirements of the Quality System regulation, ...
    www.aami.org/meetings/courses/software.html - Cached - Similar -
  7. Software Validation - Minitab

    Minitab Statistical Software Validation Kits are downloadable ZIP files which contain details about our validation process, software development life cycle, ...
    www.minitab.com/support/.../software-validation.aspx - Cached - Similar -
  8. FDA Software Validation with Static Source Code Analysis | Klocwork

    Address FDA guidance for software validation throughout the software development lifecycle with Klocwork K7. Software Verification, Defect Prevention, ...
    www.klocwork.com/solutions/fdaSoftwareValidation.asp - Cached - Similar -

    vefification and VALIDATION

    Verification and Validation (software)

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    In software project management, software testing, and software engineering, Verification and Validation (V&V) is the process of checking that a software system meets specifications and that it fulfils its intended purpose. It is normally part of the software testing process of a project.

    Contents

    [hide]

    FAQs

    ...